This week’s readings center around
the intersections of race and sexuality, more specifically they critique the
concepts of race and sexuality in the context of nationalism and
imperialism. It is interesting to
examine these concepts through the history that the researcher presents to the
reader. All the readings help form ideas
around a broad lens of queerness around subjects that were not necessarily
directly related to sexual identity.
For me this weeks readings was lot
to take in. It is interesting to think
about the large effects that imperialism has on not only nations identity, but
individuals identity formation. The
readings also provide examples of intergenerational trauma that people of color
suffer from based on being forced to turn their narratives into narratives that
model the while male perspective.
When relating this back to my own
work it is important to understand these concepts and perspectives. Working with diverse groups of young people
it is important to understand various aspects that could possible make up there
identity. I also found it helpful to
reflect on the histories discussed in the Ferguson reading, and the trauma that
those histories weave into families.
Discussion Question
·
What does research look like that uses queer of
color methodologies, but is in disciplines that do not normally function within
these lenses?
·
How could research and these methodologies
benefit cultural relevancy within education?
No comments:
Post a Comment