In Imperial Blues,
Ngo investigates Jazz Age New York and the ways race, sexuality, and empire
were produced and mobilized these spaces.
She explains, “the domestic or national organization of race and sex
during the Jazz Age, and in New York City as an exemplar of this period’s
sensibilities, cannot be understood except in the context of the growing
ambitions of modern U.S. empire”(4).
Through an analysis of empire’s workings within the city, Ngo traces the
imperial logics that organized these “modern” spaces and shaped identity
formation. Her approach highlights the “contact
zones” of jazz cultures that link the domestic and foreign. Drawing from cultural studies and
transnational feminist interventions, Ngo illustrates how imperial logic
informs meaning making and the boundaries of seemingly distinct social
categories. Imperial logics work through
the “spatial reorientation” of different global and orientalized symbols that
are mobilized and consumed in the service of both transgression and
regulation. Ngo explains, “not only were
the markers of imperial logic peripatetic- attaching themselves to various
spaces, objects, and bodies and then detaching themselves again- but the
meanings created through their circulation rendered them unstable”(5). She analyzes how cosmopolitanism, as well as
resulting moral panics, were constructed in relation to these imperial logics,
and that the mobility of these symbols still reflect asymmetrical power
relations.
Space is an
important theme in the book that is inseparable from the construction of race,
sexuality, and nation. Ngo examines the
loaded meanings of different Jazz Age figures and spaces, like the “fallen
woman” of Vivian Gordon. She argues,
“race and racialization thereby occur through modes of comparison and contact
that are also spatial in nature- such as distance, contamination, analogy,
intimacy, proximity, juxtaposition, and directionality”(27). By looking at both empire and space in jazz
cultures, Ngo enables an intersectional and transnational analysis of the
production of racial, gendered, and sexual meanings. She also illustrates how Jazz Age
transgression frequently relied upon imperial logics and the dangers of such
spatial crossing were simultaneously policed and regulated. Ngo’s analysis is
useful for thinking about the way empire informs racial and sexual hierarchies
and categorization within the US, and how orientalism might apply not just to
Asian bodies, but can be mobilized in different ways. I also thought it was important
that Ngo offers a brief examination of how imperial logics relate to settler
colonialism, and appropriation of indigenous cultures.
Ngo’s discussion of mobility and tourism is particularly
timely with the current anxieties about national borders and globalization, and
policies like the border wall and Muslim ban.
Her analysis raises important questions about who can be mobile and how
racial and sexual meanings map on to these current border crossings or
exclusions. How can an analysis of space
be useful in these debates? Can we see
any spatial reorientations at work in these current national and imperial
logics?
No comments:
Post a Comment